McCann v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “statute [abolishing the voluntary intoxication defense] was not in effect at the time of the subject crimes and [was therefore] not applicable in this case”
• reversing summary denial where the trial court did not fully address this claim and it was not refuted by attachments to the trial court’s order
• reversing summary denial because the trial court did not fully address the claim and it was not refuted by attachments to the trial court’s order
• “To the extent that any [rule 3.850] claim is not conclusively refuted by the record, the trial court must conduct an evidentiary hearing on that claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hammel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-02· cited 10×
• Ciambrone v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-12-11· cited 6×
• Evans v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-06-07
• Rogers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-09

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McLin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-09-12· cited 146×
• Sirmons v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-02-03· cited 99×
• Hayes v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-11-21· cited 75×
• Guisasola v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-23· cited 15×
• Comfort v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-29· cited 9×
• Straitwell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-15· cited 7×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-12· cited 4×
• Tidwell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-20· cited 3×
• McCann v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-21· cited 1×
• Craig v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-22· cited 1×