McCann v. Iroquois Memorial Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff's recollection that unlawful wiretapping occurred on a day in February was sufficient to defeat the defendant's motion for summary judgment
• “In contrast, when the change is plausible and the party offers a suitable explanation such as confusion, mistake, or lapse in memory, a change in testimony affects only its credibility, not its admissibility.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).