McCann v. Hy-Vee, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “violation” for the purposes of § 1658(b)(2) is the date of the “misrepresentation,” triggering the period “from the date of the fraud rather than the date of the injury”
• observing that the starting gate in statutes of limitations is usually expressed as the date on which such claim accrues
• explaining that equitable tolling does not apply to statutes of repose
• explaining that equitable tolling does not apply to statutes of repose
• explaining that equitable tolling does not apply to statutes of repose
• stating “although the SEC doesn’t have to prove reliance on a misrepresentation, a private party would have to, as otherwise he would have suffered no injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).