California Supreme Court· 2/18/2010
McCann v. Foster Wheeler LLC
Citations
- 48 Cal. 4th 68
- 225 P.3d 516
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Oklahoma had an interest in applying its statute of repose to a products-liability action involving improvements to real property in Oklahoma, even though the defendant was not an Oklahoma company
- recognizing that although California no longer uniformly applied the law of the jurisdiction in which the allegedly tortious conduct occurred, Oklahoma’s interests “would be more impaired if its law were not applied” as the plaintiff’s exposure to asbestos occurred in Oklahoma
- determining that law of state of exposure to asbestos governs rather than law of state where diagnosis of mesothelioma occurred
- pointing out that the geographic location of an omission is the place of the transaction where it should have been disclosed
- “[T]he earlier methodology for resolving choice-of-law issues has been replaced in this state by the governmental interest mode of analysis.”
- governmental interest test, a product of common law, does not apply when the California legislature has passed a statute that 22 unambiguously resolves the choice of law issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: George
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2012-01-12· cited 510×
- Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.California Supreme Court· 2011-06-30· cited 131×
- Aaron Senne v. Kansas City Royals BaseballNinth Circuit· 2019-08-16· cited 98×
- Yao-Wen Chang v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2010-03-26· cited 75×
- Henry Sims, Jr. v. Kia Motors of America, IFifth Circuit· 2016-10-05· cited 75×
- Jason Yamada v. Nobel Biocare Holding AgNinth Circuit· 2016-04-20· cited 60×
- Frenzel v. AliphcomN.D. California· 2014-12-29· cited 54×
- Rutledge v. Hewlett-Packard Co.California Court of Appeal· 2015-07-22· cited 51×
- Astiana v. Kashi Co.S.D. California· 2013-07-30· cited 50×
- Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-08-09· cited 48×
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationS.D. California· 2017-03-14· cited 48×
- Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.C.D. California· 2012-06-12· cited 43×
- In re Yahoo Mail LitigationN.D. California· 2015-05-26· cited 36×
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationS.D. California· 2012-10-11· cited 32×
- Greb v. Diamond International Corp.California Supreme Court· 2013-02-21· cited 28×
- Campbell v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal· 2012-05-21· cited 25×
- Chen v. Los Angeles Truck Centers, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court· 2019-07-22· cited 24×
- Bias v. Wells Fargo & Co.N.D. California· 2013-04-25· cited 24×
- Karen Stromberg v. Qualcomm Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2021-09-29· cited 23×
- Gustafson v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPC.D. California· 2013-11-04· cited 21×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court· 1985-06-26· cited 1,691×
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court· 1975-03-31· cited 760×
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court· 1981-03-02· cited 549×
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-05-31· cited 308×
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-10-30· cited 256×
- Bernhard v. Harrah's ClubCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-03-02· cited 199×
- Buckeye Boiler Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-08-28· cited 170×
- Offshore Rental Co. v. Continental Oil Co.California Supreme Court· 1978-09-18· cited 140×
- Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2006-07-13· cited 140×
- Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-01-28· cited 119×
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1989-11-08· cited 111×
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. YatesSupreme Court· 1936-12-07· cited 108×
- Grant v. McAuliffeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-12-23· cited 103×
- Robert L. Turcotte, Administrator of the Estate of Gerard P. Turcotte v. Ford Motor CompanyFirst Circuit· 1974-04-08· cited 98×
- Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.California Supreme Court· 2000-05-15· cited 87×
- Alfred Gerome Nelson and Vida Nelson v. International Paint CompanyNinth Circuit· 1983-10-24· cited 80×
- Arno v. Club Med Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1994-05-04· cited 75×
- Ashland Chemical Co. v. ProvenceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-03-16· cited 65×
- Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court· 1997-08-18· cited 57×
- Pack v. Beech Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware· 1957-05-24· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.