· 4/3/1997
McCandless v. United Southern Assurance Co.
Citations
- 953 P.2d 911
- 191 Ariz. 167
- 240 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 7
- 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 51
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that when the legislature amends an existing statute, the court pre sumes the legislature intended some change in existing law
- “[I]f the legislature, in adding to a statutory scheme, does not amend an existing statute which would impact on the addition, we must presume the legislature intended the existing statute to impact the addition.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sult, Fidel, Patterson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.