Skip to main content
· 4/3/1997

McCandless v. United Southern Assurance Co.

Citations

  • 953 P.2d 911
  • 191 Ariz. 167
  • 240 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 7
  • 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when the legislature amends an existing statute, the court pre sumes the legislature intended some change in existing law
  • “[I]f the legislature, in adding to a statutory scheme, does not amend an existing statute which would impact on the addition, we must presume the legislature intended the existing statute to impact the addition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sult, Fidel, Patterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.