· 3/17/1905
McCandless v. Lee Chew
Citations
- 16 Haw. 530
- 1905 Haw. LEXIS 83
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a claimant may not obtain review of the Board’s decision by the CAVC until that decision is final
- holding that a petitioner’s appeal to the Court of Veterans Appeals was premature where “he had failed to exhaust the administrative remedies available to him, including seeking review by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals”
- liberally construing a letter from a pro se litigant to be a petition for extraordinary relief
- “The Court, having been ‘established by Act of Congress,’ has [authority] to act ‘in aid of [its] ... jurisdiction ]’ pursuant to the All Writs Act....”
- Court liberally construed the allegations and prayer for relief of pro se appellant
- Court liberally construed the allegations and prayer for relief of pro se appellant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frear, Hartwell, Wilder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.