Skip to main content
· 3/17/1905

McCandless v. Lee Chew

Citations

  • 16 Haw. 530
  • 1905 Haw. LEXIS 83

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claimant may not obtain review of the Board’s decision by the CAVC until that decision is final
  • holding that a petitioner’s appeal to the Court of Veterans Appeals was premature where “he had failed to exhaust the administrative remedies available to him, including seeking review by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals”
  • liberally construing a letter from a pro se litigant to be a petition for extraordinary relief
  • “The Court, having been ‘established by Act of Congress,’ has [authority] to act ‘in aid of [its] ... jurisdiction ]’ pursuant to the All Writs Act....”
  • Court liberally construed the allegations and prayer for relief of pro se appellant
  • Court liberally construed the allegations and prayer for relief of pro se appellant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frear, Hartwell, Wilder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.