Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 11/5/1934

McCandless v. Furlaud

Citations

  • 293 U.S. 67
  • 55 S. Ct. 42
  • 79 L. Ed. 202
  • 1934 U.S. LEXIS 1006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “if the validity of his appointment as ancillary receiver had been seasonably urged in the trial court, the plaintiff might have remedied the defect ... [and] the trial court might have permitted the appropriate amendment of the bill of complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brandeis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.