McCallister v. McCallister

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We agree with plaintiff that his retirement constitutes changed circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Loutts v. Loutts
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2012-09-20· cited 184×
• Moore v. Moore
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-12-08· cited 64×
• Thaddeus J Andrusz v. Jacqueline R Andrusz
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2017-07-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Walker v. Walker
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-10-08· cited 19×
• Crouse v. Crouse
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1985-01-14· cited 18×
• McCallister v. McCallister
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-11-19· cited 15×
• Torakis v. Torakis
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-05-05· cited 13×
• Stoltman v. Stoltman
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-08-16· cited 10×
• Lang v. Lang
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-06-20· cited 9×
• Weaver v. Weaver
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-10-17· cited 6×