Skip to main content
· 11/22/1995

McCall v. Dynic USA Corp.

Citations

  • 906 P.2d 295
  • 138 Or. App. 1
  • 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1635

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • issue “actually litigated” when, “because of the way plaintiff framed the issues in the [previous action before Workers’ Compensation Board,] the Board necessarily had to decide” the same issue presented in later action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Edmonds, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.