Fifth Circuit· 11/3/2004
McCall v. Dretke
Citations
- 390 F.3d 358
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22791
- 2004 WL 2453893
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a prisoner suffers actionable harm and thus may bring a § 2254 application when authorities determine his eligibility for release and he need not wait until he would otherwise be eligible for release
- explaining that standing is an essential component of federal subject matter jurisdiction
- application of intervening change in law is not ex post facto violation when it is not ‘an additional penalty for earlier crimes,’ but [rather] ‘a stiffened penalty for the latest crime’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Garza, Prado
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Texas Democratic Party v. BenkiserFifth Circuit· 2006-08-03· cited 129×
- Kittelson v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2005-09-20· cited 77×
- Bradley Register v. Rick Thaler, DirectorFifth Circuit· 2012-05-17· cited 28×
- Tennard v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2006-03-01· cited 11×
- BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Texas Realty Holdings, LLCS.D. Texas· 2012-09-28· cited 10×
- Keith Jordan v. Doug Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionFifth Circuit· 2005-07-06· cited 9×
- United States v. MorganDistrict of Columbia· 2017-06-09· cited 2×
- Jordan v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2005-08-16
- Schydlower v. Pan American Life InsuranceW.D. Texas· 2005-09-27
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1990-04-24· cited 2,590×
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,936×
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court· 1995-04-25· cited 1,142×
- Dino Cinel v. Harry F. Connick, Individually and as District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans, State of LouisianaFifth Circuit· 1994-03-11· cited 1,049×
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 732×
- Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court· 1948-10-11· cited 726×
- Barrientes v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 2000-09-05· cited 237×
- Warren v. MilesFifth Circuit· 2000-10-13· cited 137×
- United Transportation Union v. FosterFifth Circuit· 2000-03-17· cited 122×
- United States v. Henry L. YkemaSixth Circuit· 1989-10-12· cited 80×
- Robertson v. CainFifth Circuit· 2003-03-05· cited 56×
- United States v. Saenz-ForeroFifth Circuit· 1994-07-20· cited 37×
- Phillip Perkins v. Donald Cabana, Superintendent of M.D.O.C. And Governor of State of Mississippi, Morris Thigpen, CommissionerFifth Circuit· 1986-06-30· cited 15×
- Allandale Neighborhood Association v. Austin Transportation Study Policy Advisory CommitteeFifth Circuit· 1988-03-22· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.