· 3/17/2008
McCadney v. Astrue
Citations
- 519 F.3d 764
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 5633
- 2008 WL 696475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the ALJ was required to consider and weigh all medical opinions
- remanding because it was unclear whether the ALJ meant to discount parts of the treating physician’s opinion, and if so, why
- remanding where it was unclear what weight the ALJ afforded to a medical opinion and why
- remanding for clarification when ALJ failed to explain why the RFC deviated from a medical opinion
- remanding for clarification when the ALJ failed to explain why the RFC deviated from a medical opinion
- remanding for clarification when ALJ failed to explain why the RFC deviated from a medical opinion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bye, Beam, Gruender
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.