McCabe v. Cruikshank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that when a defendant is unclear about the meaning of a particular allegation in the complaint, the proper course of action is not to move to dismiss but to move for a more definite statement
• denying a motion for a more definite statement because “a review of the defendants’ submissions established that the defendants underst[oo]d the crux of [Potts’] claim”
• “Rule 12(e) should not frustrate the ‘liberality’ of the notice pleading requirements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).