McCaa v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where the complaint fails to specify damages, the court 11 will not infer that the amount in controversy exceeds the statutory threshold
• “it is not facially apparent from Plaintiff's complaint that the amount in 17 controversy exceeds $75,000” when the plaintiff merely requests damages “in excess of 18 $10,000.00”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).