McBride v. Pizza Hut, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defamation claim based on statements to the Department of Employment Services that the plaintiff had been discharged for theft had to be dismissed because the report was required by law
• dismissing the defamation count in addition to the injurious falsehood count because they were both based on the absolutely privileged communication
• written correspondence between parties’ counsel concerning threatened lawsuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).