McBride v. Monroe County Office of Family & Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that testimony of child's court-appointed advocate regarding child's need for permanency supports a finding that termination of parent-child relationship is in child's best interests
• concluding that CASA testimony regarding child’s need for permanency supports a finding that termination of parent-child relationship is in child’s best interests
• holding that a mother had waived appellate review of her due process claim when she raised it for the first time on appeal
• concluding that testimony of child's court-appointed advocate regarding child's need for permanency supports a finding that termination of parent-child relationship is in child's best interests
• holding that the testimony of the child’s CASA is sufficient to support the trial court’s conclusion that termination is in the child’s best interests.
• concluding that testimony regarding a child's need for permanency, coupled with the fact that the children were thriving in their current foster home, supports a finding that termination is in the child's best interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).