· 11/8/1977
McBride v. Arends
Citations
- 263 N.W.2d 5
- 79 Mich. App. 440
- 1977 Mich. App. LEXIS 787
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the plaintiff could seek recovery on a promissory note following forfeiture proceedings on a land contract because the agreements were “separate and distinct contracts, one for the sale of real property, and one for the sale of personalty”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Gillis, Maher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.