Skip to main content
· 11/8/1977

McBride v. Arends

Citations

  • 263 N.W.2d 5
  • 79 Mich. App. 440
  • 1977 Mich. App. LEXIS 787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff could seek recovery on a promissory note following forfeiture proceedings on a land contract because the agreements were “separate and distinct contracts, one for the sale of real property, and one for the sale of personalty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Gillis, Maher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.