McBeth v. Bishop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding testimony which was normally inadmissible because of the-“dead man’s” statute admissible because another witness testified to substantially the same matters
• admission of testimony in the instances complained of, although technically in violation of the statute, affords no ground upon which to reverse the verdict, because testimony was only cumulative to other testimony establishing the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).