Skip to main content
· 8/9/1973

McArthur v. Donnell

Citations

  • 9 Wash. App. 1014

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because the contract is ambiguous, ascertaining its meaning is a question of fact, and the trial court therefore erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment.”
  • “If, based on that examination [of the text and context] and a review of the circumstances of the contract’s formation, the meaning of the provisions is clear, we construe the terms as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.