Skip to main content
· 9/13/2006

McArdle v. Mattel Inc.

Citations

  • 456 F. Supp. 2d 769
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66308
  • 2006 WL 2668860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding author’s unjust enrichment claim to be preempted by federal copyright law because the claim is an equitable, quasi-contractual claim that exists where there is no express contract
  • claim preempted where author alleged Mattel copied author’s concepts and ideas in Barbie product line

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heartfield, Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.