McAndrews, J. v. Prothy of the PA Supreme Ct

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming entry of summary judgment when appellant’s principal brief did not challenge independent and sufficient ground for judgment
• interpreting Minn.Stat. § 580.08 (2012) and noting that “[t]he Jackson opinion suggests that strict compliance is required for all statutes within chapter 580, not just for section 580.02.”
• affirming grant of summary judgment where the district court provided two 13 independent and sufficient grounds for the grant and appellant did not challenge one of the grounds
• affirming summary judgment on four counts of a complaint after determining that the appellant forfeited review because its primary brief did not challenge “an independent and sufficient basis for the district court’s entry of summary judgment”
• “The Jackson opinion suggests that strict compliance is required for all statutes within chapter 580, not just for section 580.02.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).