McAllister v. Robbins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment where there was “no question of duty to warn, since plaintiff’s knowledge was equal with that of the defendants”
• affirming summary judgment where there was “no question of duty to warn, since plaintiffs knowledge was equal with that of the defendants”
• affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendant when the plaintiffs injuries were caused by an obstruction that the plaintiff saw but negotiated incorrectly
• relying in part on evidence that no one had fallen over the concrete blocks at issue during the preceding seventeen years
• affirming a summary judgment for the landowner in a trip and fall case because there was no evidence that anyone had fallen over the concrete blocks during the preceding 17 years in which the condition had existed
• “[A] person is not required to take measures to avoid a danger which the circumstances as known to him do not suggest as likely to happen.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).