McAllister v. Okanogan County
Citations
- 51 Wash. 647
- 100 P. 146
- 1909 Wash. LEXIS 1248
Syllabus
<p>Public Lands — Settlers — Right of Occupancy — Unsurveyed Land — Statutes—Construction. Vol. 23 Stat. 321, prohibiting the unlawful occupancy of the public domain was not intended to prevent actual bona fide settlers from inclosing an entryman’s proportion of unsurveyed land.</p> <p>Same — Grants-—Rights of Way — Highways — Settlers on Unsurveyed Land — Possessory Rights. U. S. Rev. Stats., § 2477, granting rights of way over the unreserved public lands of the United States, and Laws 1903, p. 155, authorizing boards of county commissioners to accept by resolution such Congressional grant, do not amount to a grant in praesenti, as to unsurveyed lands in the possession of a bona fide settler; but the grant is held in abeyance until a highway is established by law (overruling Okanogan County v. GUeetham, 37 Wash. 682).</p> <p>Same — Eminent Domain. A bona fide settler in peaceable possession of an entryman’s proportion of unsurveyed public lands, who had enclosed the lands and made improvements, has such an interest in. the lands as to preclude the opening of a county road across the same without condemning his interests.</p>
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bureau of Land ManagementTenth Circuit· 2005-10-12· cited 154×
- Our Lady of the Rockies, Inc. v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court· 2008-04-01· cited 16×
- Stofferan v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1913-11-01· cited 15×
- United States v. PrudenTenth Circuit· 1949-01-24· cited 9×
- State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court· 1943-03-16· cited 4×
- Clark v. TaylorD. Alaska· 1938-06-10· cited 4×
- United States v. AndersonE.D. Washington· 1953-01-29· cited 2×
- Bradford v. DanielsenD. Alaska· 1947-11-06· cited 1×
- So. Utah Wilderness v. BLMTenth Circuit· 2005-09-08
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Leavenworth, Lawrence, & Galveston Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1876-04-10· cited 258×
- Railroad Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court· 1881-05-18· cited 131×
- Fremont v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1855-03-10· cited 68×
- Hall v. RussellSupreme Court· 1880-01-18· cited 59×
- Missouri, Kansas, & Texas Railway Co. v. Kansas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1878-10-15· cited 55×
- Buxton v. TraverSupreme Court· 1889-04-01· cited 43×
- Okanogan County v. CheethamWashington Supreme Court· 1905-03-29· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.