McAllister v. City of Atlantic

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pretermitting whether statements potentially expressing the opinions of the police officers who conducted the defendant's interrogation were admissible under OCGA §§ 24-7-704 and 24-4-403 and holding that the defendant failed to prove the harm prong of the plain error test
• pretermitting whether statements potentially expressing the opinions of the police officers who conducted the defendant’s interrogation were admissible under OCGA §§ 24-7-704 and 24-4-403 and holding that the defendant failed to prove the harm prong of the plain error test
• “someone with a significant personal connection to the test could testify in lieu of the scientist who actually conducted it”
• suspect initiated discussion when, while smoking a cigarette after her first court appearance, she “spontaneously” told the officer who was watching her details about the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).