Skip to main content
· 8/7/2008

McAlister v. Potter

Citations

  • 570 F. Supp. 2d 24
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60527
  • 2008 WL 3285769

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Wholly absent from Plaintiffs opposition is any explanation for her failure to comply with the 180-day filing requirement. Nor does Plaintiff set forth any basis upon which the Court may waive the fifing requirement or otherwise grant equitable relief.”
  • \Wholly absent from Plaintiff's opposition is any explanation for her failure to comply with the 180-day filing requirement. Nor does Plaintiff set forth any basis upon which the Court may waive the filing requirement or otherwise grant equitable relief.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosemary M. Collyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.