McAlester Gas & Coke Co. v. Corporation Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Defendant may still be held liable under a ‘cat’s paw’ theory of retaliation.” 51 (citing, among other cases, Walker v. Johnson, 798 F.3d 1085, 1095–96 (D.C. Cir. 2015)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).