McAdams v. MONIER, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because of defendant’s failure to disclose information “which would have been material to any reasonable person who purchased” the product, a presumption of reliance was justified
• noting that “relief under the UCL ... is available without individualized proof of deception, reliance and injury” (citation omitted)
• noting that there is a “less stringent” standard for plaintiffs not bringing class actions, and that relief “under the UCL is available without individualized proof of deception, reliance and injury”
• reversing denial of class certification in CLRA action against manufacturer of allegedly defective roof tiles purchased from third-party distributor
• reversing denial of class certification in CLRA action against manufacturer of allegedly defective roof tiles purchased from third-party distributor
• applying inference of reliance from omission or “failure to disclose” material information; record permitted inference of common reliance under CLRA where plaintiff alleged that defendant made material misrepresentation to all class members

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).