McADAM ET UX v. SMITH

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing that an intervening strip conveyed by the grantor to the railroad did not indicate an intention with regard to the conveyance of abutting tideland
• recognizing \that a conveyance of the upland passes title to land in the bed of the river or way” and applying this presumption to \conveyances involving abutting tideland” as well
• observing, in dictum, that, in some jurisdictions, where the grantor owns the entire underlying area and no land on the opposite side of the street, all of the underlying area passes to the grantee
• discussing generally held rules of construction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).