McAbee v. Daniel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the requirement that dog owner knew of dog’s dangerous propensities as “required by Missio . . . is not required in the case at bar where there is proof of negligence of the part of the defendant . . . in failing to properly control the dog.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).