M.C. & D. Capital Corporation v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the face of this provision [FAR 52.236-11(a)], it is difficult to understand MC &D’s argument that the government’s taking possession of the work constituted acceptance”
• unapproved variation or deviation from requirements of a construction contract justified default termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).