Skip to main content
· 4/28/2006

MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. Credit

Citations

  • 281 Kan. 655
  • 132 P.3d 898
  • 2006 Kan. LEXIS 224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying state law to determine proper method of service only after determining that the parties’ agreement was silent on the issue
  • applying state law to determine proper method of service only after determining that the parties' agreement was silent on the issue
  • “MBNA cannot rely on Credit’s tardiness in challenging the award if the arbitrator never had jurisdiction to arbitrate and enter an award”
  • \MBNA cannot rely on Credit's tardiness in challenging the award if the arbitrator never had jurisdiction to arbitrate and enter an award\
  • \[A] national trend [has arisen] in which consumers are questioning MBNA and whether arbitration agreements exist. [Citations.]\
  • “[A] national trend [has arisen] in which consumers are questioning MBNA and whether arbitration agreements exist. [Citations.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.