· 4/28/2006
MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. Credit
Citations
- 281 Kan. 655
- 132 P.3d 898
- 2006 Kan. LEXIS 224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying state law to determine proper method of service only after determining that the parties’ agreement was silent on the issue
- applying state law to determine proper method of service only after determining that the parties' agreement was silent on the issue
- “MBNA cannot rely on Credit’s tardiness in challenging the award if the arbitrator never had jurisdiction to arbitrate and enter an award”
- \MBNA cannot rely on Credit's tardiness in challenging the award if the arbitrator never had jurisdiction to arbitrate and enter an award\
- \[A] national trend [has arisen] in which consumers are questioning MBNA and whether arbitration agreements exist. [Citations.]\
- “[A] national trend [has arisen] in which consumers are questioning MBNA and whether arbitration agreements exist. [Citations.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beier
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.