MBM Corporation/Sedgwick Claims Management etc. v. Archer Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Title VII does not “forbid[] favoritism, nepotism, or cronyism, so long as it is not premised on animus against a protected class”
• holding that Title VII does not “forbid[ ] favoritism, nepotism, or cronyism, so long as it is not premised on animus against a protected class.”
• noting that “claims of racial discrimination [are analyzed] identically under Title VII and § 1981”
• finding that discrimination based on ethnicity, including Hispanicity or lack thereof, constitutes racial discrimination under Title VII
• explaining that “Hispanic” is a protected class on the basis of either race or national origin, depending on the facts of the case
• noting that “claims of racial discrimination [are analyzed] identically under Title VII and § 1981”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).