M.B. v. St. Francis Preparatory Sch.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that state law determines appropriate procedure to be followed by state to assert jurisdiction over acts committed by Indians on the reservation when the federal statute is silent
• holding that a state law that allowed the state to assume only partial jurisdiction over Indians and Indian territory did not require strict scrutiny and was rationally related to a valid state objective
• holding that RCW 37.12.010 complies with Public Law 280 and is constitutional
• explaining that Public Law 280’s mandatory criminal jurisdiction “effected an immediate cession of criminal and civil jurisdiction over Indian country” to affected states
• explaining that Public Law 280's mandatory criminal jurisdiction \effected an immediate cession of criminal and civil jurisdiction over Indian country\ to affected states
• explaining that Public Law 280’s mandatory criminal jurisdiction “effected an immediate cession of criminal and civil jurisdiction over Indian country” to affected states

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).