· 5/4/1988
Mazzoni v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Citations
- 115 Pa. Commw. 630
- 540 A.2d 1000
- 1988 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 341
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that false 28 testimony of a witness or admission of a forged document into evidence are intrinsic fraud, distinct from extrinsic fraud
- noting that California law required determination of subject 6 matter jurisdiction “with reference to foreign law” when brought as defense to recognition of 7 foreign judgment, and applying French law
- applying 11 French law to questions related to recognition and enforceability of French judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barbieri, Craig, Palladino
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.