· 11/17/1980
Mazzola v. City and County of San Francisco
Citations
- 112 Cal. App. 3d 141
- 169 Cal. Rptr. 127
- 105 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3360
- 1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 2442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where amendment consists of a deletion of an express provision, substantial change in law presumably intended
- notice gives employee or officer “a chance to either appeal the agency’s determination” or else resolve the conflict by “resign[ing] from either his outside or agency position”
- agency was precluded from alleging section 1126 violation where it knew of employee’s outside activities at time of appointment and did not notify him they were incompatible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.