Skip to main content
· 3/29/2012

Mazza v. Verizon Washington, Dc, Inc.

Citations

  • 852 F. Supp. 2d 28
  • 2012 WL 1058214
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that authority to enforce Subsection (a) rests exclusively with the federal and state agencies and officials identified in Section 1681s
  • recognizing, “as courts in this District and multiple Circuits have held, the FCRA does provide a 8 private right of action for violations under Section 1681s–2(b)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Emmet G. Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.