Mazur v. Roughsedge Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the court’s jurisdiction was to be “exercised for the benefit of the infant primarily, but not arbi- trarily in disregard of the father’s natural right to be preferred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).