Mazur v. Hymas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court found University of Idaho immune since judgment would have to be satisfied by state funds or would have to be supplemented by state funds
• “[T]he Tort Claims Act specifically provides that immunities under federal law shall remain in effect.”
• remanding case barred by Eleventh Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Boyle v. City of Liberty, Mo.
  W.D. Missouri· 1993-10-06· cited 6×
• Houghton Ex Rel. Houghton v. Board of Regents of the University of Washington
  S.D. New York· 1988-08-09· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
  Supreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 8,956×
• Silver v. Baggiano
  Eleventh Circuit· 1986-11-24· cited 75×
• Doe v. Maher
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-07-11· cited 52×
• David Nursing Home v. Michigan Department of Social Services
  E.D. Michigan· 1984-02-09· cited 9×
• ME. ASS'N OF INTERDEPENDENT NEIGHBORHOODS v. Petit
  D. Maine· 1987-04-28· cited 8×
• Ferguson v. Greater Pocatello Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
  D. Idaho· 1985-06-17· cited 7×
• Interstate Const. Co. v. Regents of University of Idaho
  D. Idaho· 1912-08-20· cited 6×
• Milbouer v. Keppler
  D. Idaho· 1986-09-16· cited 5×
• State v. Ott
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1980-02-06· cited 4×
• Phœnix Lumber Co. v. Regents of University of Idaho
  D. Idaho· 1908-09-08· cited 3×