Skip to main content
· 4/11/2024

Maziarz v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Cleveland provides the standard to be used when applying judicial estoppel in the context of a motion for summary judgment where the initial assertions were accepted by a court or agency
  • holding that in such eases where mere reference to the statutory distinctions was inadequate, a plaintiff should be required to “provide some additional rationale to explain the plaintiffs apparent about-face concerning the extent of the injuries.”
  • same as to NJLAD claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.