Skip to main content
· 1/23/1975

Mazer v. Security Insurance Group & Medical Protective Co.

Citations

  • 507 F.2d 1338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding admission of challenged testimony did not prejudice defendant since same testimony had already been admitted without objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.