Maywood v. Texas Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute limiting mine workers to an 8-hour day unless otherwise provided in a collective bargaining agreement is not preempted
• holding employee's \lack of motivation\ 12 because he/she lacks \a sufficient individual economic stake in the outcome\ is 13 insufficient to show \genuine obstacle\
• noting that one purpose of the prudential standing rule barring assertion of third party rights is “to avoid adjudicating rights a third party may not wish to assert”
• finding no third-party standing absent a showing of a “genuine obstacle” to the affected individuals bringing their own claims
• upholding California law setting a maximum workday standard for mineworkers but allowing unionized workers to opt out through a CBA
• finding no preemption of statute setting maximum hours per day in mining industry unless modified by CBA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).