· 9/19/1973
Maytag Company v. Partridge
Citations
- 210 N.W.2d 584
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding property must be valued as it is presently being used
- rejecting an expert’s analysis that valued machinery in use in the Maytag factory based on the used machinery market price
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Rawlings, Legrand, Uhlenhopp, McCormick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.