Mays v. Tennessee Valley Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it would not constitute a discretionary decision to decide whether to follow or act pursuant to [] policies and procedures”
• stating that “once TVA exercised its discretion to construct, use, and keep in operation the Swan Pond facilities, it was obligated to operate the facilities in a non-negligent manner”
• giving cases, statutes, and executive acts that have recognized TVA’s status as a federal agency
• applying the discretionary function doctrine to the activities of a coal-fired power plant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).