Mays v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence is proper as rebuttal if it explains, replies to, or contradicts any new evidence presented by the accused

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-10-31· cited 113×
• Ayers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-07-21· cited 72×
• Huffington v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-12-06· cited 44×
• Scarborough v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-12-04· cited 37×
• State v. Booze
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-03-11· cited 28×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-07-09· cited 25×
• Fairfax Savings, F.S.B. v. Ellerin
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-03-26· cited 13×
• Bloodsworth v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-07-08· cited 12×
• Kulbicki v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-12-01· cited 8×
• Morgan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-05-03· cited 4×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Von Lusch v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-01-31· cited 92×
• State v. Hepple
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-02-01· cited 55×