Skip to main content
· 3/19/2003

Mays v. Hao Chang

Citations

  • 579 S.E.2d 561
  • 213 W. Va. 220
  • 2003 W. Va. LEXIS 18

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • commenting that “questions of proximate cause are often fact-based issues reserved for jury resolution”
  • “[T]here is no tort—common law, statutory, or constitutional—without an injury[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.