Mays v. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “perfunctory complaints” failing “to frame and develop an issue” are not “sufficient to invoke appellate review”
• stating that the ALJ must “give consideration to all the medical opinions in the record” and “discuss the weight he assigns to them”
• finding that reviewing court can determine that an ALJ “implicitly declined to give the opinion controlling weight”
• stating that the ALJ must “give consideration to all the medical opinions in the record” and “discuss the weight he assigns to them”
• stating that “an ALJ’s failure to weigh a medical opinion involves harmless error if there is no inconsistency between the opinion and the ALJ’s assessment of residual functional capacity”
• noting that because it was clear “from the decision that the ALJ declined to give controlling weight to” the treating physician’s “opinion, [the court would] not reverse on this ground”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).