Skip to main content
· 10/15/1996

Mayor of Savannah v. Savannah Cigarette & Amusement Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 476 S.E.2d 581
  • 267 Ga. 173
  • 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 3620
  • 1996 Ga. LEXIS 875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaffirming a previous Supreme Court ruling that a party challenging rezoning must petition local authorities for relief prior to asking a court of equity to declare a zoning ordinance unconstitutional
  • suit challenging rezoning was procedurally barred irrespective of whether the plaintiffs claim was “couched in terms of eminent domain”
  • “[e]ven assuming that inverse condemnation is an available remedy” where a landowner’s property is rezoned by the governing authority
  • states “[e]ven assuming that inverse condemnation is an available remedy” where a landowner’s property is rezoned by the governing authority
  • the action was an attempt to circumvent the requirement to exhaust available administrative remedies and so was procedurally barred
  • the action was an attempt to circumvent the requirement to exhaust available administrative remedies and so was procedurally barred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines, Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.