Skip to main content
S.D. Ohio· 3/9/1993

Mayo v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Citations

  • 148 F.R.D. 576
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11113
  • 1993 WL 163455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, for purposes of a class certification motion, the court must accept as true all factual allegations in the complaint and may draw reasonable inferences therefrom
  • holding that the court should not consider the merits when deciding whether to certify the class
  • finding predominance when plaintiffs’ “allegations turn on [defendant’s] use of identical forms, common sales techniques, and routinized procedures”
  • common questions predominate where plaintiffs’ allegations hinge on the use of standardized forms and routine procedures
  • finding availability of statutory attorney fees weighed against superiority
  • finding availability of statutory attorney fees weighed against superiority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.