· 6/13/2011
Mayo v. RECYCLE TO CONSERVE, INC.
Citations
- 795 F. Supp. 2d 1031
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62854
- 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,204
- 2011 WL 2433367
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The court finds that an investigation into whether plaintiff was terminated to retaliate 13 against plaintiff for engaging in protected activity could not ‘reasonably be expected to grow out 14 of the charge’ that defendant terminated plaintiff because of his race.”
- “The court finds that an investigation into whether plaintiff was terminated to retaliate 5 against plaintiff for engaging in protected activity could not ‘reasonably be expected to grow out 6 of the charge’ that defendant terminated plaintiff because of his race.”
- “The court finds that an investigation into whether plaintiff was terminated to retaliate 9 against plaintiff for engaging in protected activity could not ‘reasonably be expected to grow out 10 of the charge’ that defendant terminated plaintiff because of his race.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William B. Shubb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.