Skip to main content
· 12/27/1989

Mayo v. Questech, Inc.

Citations

  • 727 F. Supp. 1007
  • 36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,818
  • 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1850
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15521
  • 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,693
  • 51 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1246
  • 1989 WL 156095

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • failure to name defendants in EEOC complaint is not a fatal error
  • second and third prongs of Glus are the' most important

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.