Maynard v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer's decision to place a man with more computer experience in a position was not violative of either Title VII or ADEA
• applying the same-actor inference where the decision maker had 14 not hired the plaintiff but had previously promoted her
• applying the same-actor inference 9 where the same decisionmaker had not hired the plaintiff but had previously promoted 10 her
• rejecting the argument that the defendant’s failure to promote the plaintiff was constructive discharge
• “The pivotal question is whether the party bearing the burden of proof has presented a jury question as to each element of its case.”
• apply- ing the same-actor inference where the decisionmaker had not hired the plaintiff but had previously promoted her

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).